The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is seeking approval from the National Park Service (NPS) to install 12 monitoring stations—eight within Wilderness—in Mount Rainier National Park in Washington for detecting lahars. Your help is needed by July 9 to protect Mount Rainier from years of unwarranted helicopter incursions and unnecessary permanent structures that will mar this spectacular Wilderness.
USGS proposes in its faulty Lahar Detection System Environmental Assessment (EA) to develop eight new monitoring stations within the Mt. Rainier Wilderness for seismic and GPS monitoring and for continuous volcanic gas monitoring. USGS intends to use these stations for decades and has no end date for them. But the stations are the type of structures and installations prohibited by the 1964 Wilderness Act. And helicopter flights and landings would be used to service the stations for decades and probably in perpetuity, another violation of the Wilderness Act.
The permanent installations and regular helicopter traffic would degrade the wilderness conditions in the Mount Rainier Wilderness and the experiences of those who visit. Are we willing to sacrifice the Mt. Rainier Wilderness to permanent structures and interminable helicopter traffic for a bit more seismic information? The Wilderness Act says no, and those who support the Act and the Mount Rainier Wilderness should, too.
The EA acknowledges that the lahar monitoring stations and aircraft landings are inconsistent with preserving wilderness character. And, even if the equipment could detect an imminent eruption of Mount Rainier, there is no plan laid out on if or how wilderness visitors would be notified.
The EA fails in other ways too. It should have fully considered alternatives, such as the use of packable, temporary equipment, as well as sites outside of the Wilderness.
The NPS has unfortunately abdicated its responsibility to preserve the wilderness character of the Mount Rainier Wilderness by simply dismissing the impacts to Wilderness as acceptable since the project is for scientific research. This is certainly an improper reading of the 1964 Wilderness Act, and would also seemingly allow almost anything in Wilderness if done as part of some scientific research.
Wilderness Watch supports scientific research in Wilderness that does not degrade wilderness conditions or violate the 1964 Wilderness Act. Unfortunately, the proposed project does both.
Please go to the NPS planning website listed below to submit your public comment. Feel free to copy and paste our suggested talking points, but please use your own words where possible.